Local warehouses. Local dispatch. Australia · Canada · USA
Mitochondrial peptide comparison

MOTS-C vs Humanin.
Compare the identities.

Two names from mitochondrial-derived peptide research. Understand their separate identities, the questions studied and the material details to keep with a catalogue enquiry.

MOTS-C and Humanin are different peptides within the mitochondrial-derived peptide research field. The MOTS-C discovery paper describes a 16-residue peptide. The Humanin form discussed here has 24 residues. Their shared research category does not make the names interchangeable.

Aurelis lists MOTS-C 40 mg per unit. Humanin is a literature comparator on this page; it is not an additional catalogue entry. This guide connects the names with their original research, then explains what the existing MOTS-C listing actually specifies.

MOTS-C vs Humanin at a glance

A residue is an amino-acid building block within a peptide. Both the number and order of those building blocks help identify the molecule. Start with the full name before comparing a headline or an amount.

Two mitochondrial-derived peptide research identities
Comparison fieldMOTS-CHumanin
Name used in papersMOTS-c; styled MOTS-C in this catalogueHumanin; often abbreviated HN
Peptide length discussed here16 residues in the 2015 discovery report24-residue form in the cited Humanin work
Genetic-region contextShort reading frame within mitochondrial 12S rRNAHumanin coding sequence associated with the mitochondrial 16S rRNA region
Research examples belowMetabolic regulation and stress-responsive gene activityNeuronal-cell survival and interactions with a cell-death protein
Aurelis listing40 mg listed content per unitLiterature comparison only

The identity and genetic-region fields follow the 2015 MOTS-c discovery report, 2001 Humanin report and 2002 Humanin production study. The table compares defined materials and research questions; it does not rank their effects.

What is Humanin?

Hashimoto and colleagues identified Humanin through a functional screen using a brain-derived cDNA library. In their 2001 study, they investigated neuronal cells exposed to particular Alzheimer-related genetic and amyloid stressors. The reported cell-survival response depended on Humanin's structure and did not extend to every experimental cause of cell death they tested. Read the original study abstract.

A 2002 follow-up examined whether Humanin could be produced in biological systems. The authors reported that a cDNA containing its coding region closely matched the mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence, and they investigated peptide production and antibody detection. This helps explain the genetic-origin question behind the name. Read the Humanin production abstract.

These are specific experimental observations. Keep the named peptide, tested cell system and measured outcome together when reading a Humanin reference. A neuronal-cell result does not describe the composition or performance of a MOTS-C product.

What is MOTS-C?

Lee and colleagues described MOTS-c in 2015 after identifying a short reading frame in the mitochondrial 12S rRNA region. Their work examined metabolic regulation in cell experiments and mouse models, including insulin-response measurements. It established a separate research identity from Humanin. Read the MOTS-c discovery paper.

The capitalisation MOTS-c or MOTS-C is a writing convention in these references and catalogue pages. It is not enough to distinguish a new chemical form. For a material enquiry, retain the complete molecular specification rather than relying on a spelling variant.

How do the research questions differ?

A 2018 MOTS-c study investigated communication between mitochondria and the cell nucleus. In cultured cell experiments, metabolic stress was associated with movement of MOTS-c into the nucleus. The researchers examined AMPK-dependent movement and changes in stress-responsive gene activity. AMPK is an enzyme involved in cellular energy sensing. Read Kim and colleagues, 2018.

For Humanin, a 2003 study examined Bax, a protein involved in a cell-death pathway. The authors reported Humanin-Bax interactions and changes in Bax movement to mitochondrial membranes. Their experiments also examined isolated mitochondria and cytochrome-c release. That is a different molecular question from the MOTS-c nuclear-signalling study. Read Guo and colleagues, 2003.

The cited experiments were not a direct MOTS-C-versus-Humanin contest. Compare their outcomes by stating what each measured: a protein interaction, gene activity, cell survival or a metabolic response. Shared mitochondrial language alone does not establish equal activity or a combined effect.

Does “mitochondrial-derived” describe the supplied material?

In these papers, the term connects the peptides with genetic-origin and signalling research. It does not identify how a particular commercial material was manufactured, what chemical form it contains or whether its batch matches a paper's preparation.

Keep those questions separate in a reading note. Record the peptide name and study reference first. Then record the offered material's sequence or identity specification, chemical form and batch identifier. The quality-documentation guide explains the distinct roles of identity, purity and measured content.

What does MOTS-C 40 mg mean?

The Aurelis MOTS-C 40 mg listing states content per unit. It does not state concentration, liquid volume or an amount delivered by a device. A matching mg number on another peptide would not establish the same molecule or the same biological activity.

Use the content versus concentration guide to read those quantity fields. For a separate comparison with a mitochondrial membrane-targeting peptide, see MOTS-C vs SS-31. Humanin and SS-31 are different comparators, so the two pages answer separate naming and research questions.

Build a focused MOTS-C enquiry

State MOTS-C 40 mg, the quantity required and your destination. Identify the preferred presentation explicitly. Aurelis shows both vials and pen-style kits; confirm the actual configuration available for the selected entry. A format image does not fill in its final formulation or device specification.

If you are comparing a paper with an offered material, include the reference and ask for the matching identity and content records. A blend enquiry needs a complete component specification of its own; this family comparison does not create a Humanin and MOTS-C blend. See the blend specification guide for those additional fields.

Aurelis has warehouses in Australia, Canada and the USA. Confirm current local availability and dispatch for the selected order. Send a MOTS-C enquiry or email sales@aurelispeptides.com.

Primary sources

  1. Lee et al., Cell Metabolism, 2015 — MOTS-c discovery and metabolic experiments.
  2. Hashimoto et al., PNAS, 2001 — original Humanin neuronal-cell study.
  3. Tajima et al., Neuroscience Letters, 2002 — Humanin coding-region and peptide-production research.
  4. Kim et al., Cell Metabolism, 2018 — MOTS-c nuclear localisation and stress-responsive gene activity.
  5. Guo et al., Nature, 2003 — Humanin and Bax experiments.

Connect with Aurelis

Your next enquiry
starts with the details.

Tell us the compound, listed content, preferred presentation and destination. Our team can discuss local availability and the documentation for your selected material.